This is one stop global knowledge base where you can learn about all the products, solutions and support features.
pg_ts_config
The
pg_ts_config
catalog contains entries representing text search configurations. A configuration specifies a particular text search parser and a list of dictionaries to use for each of the parser's output token types. The parser is shown in the
pg_ts_config
entry, but the token-to-dictionary mapping is defined by subsidiary entries in
pg_ts_config_map
.
PostgreSQL 's text search features are described at length in Chapter 12.
Table 53.59.
pg_ts_config
Columns
Column Type Description |
---|
Row identifier |
Text search configuration name |
The OID of the namespace that contains this configuration |
Owner of the configuration |
The OID of the text search parser for this configuration |
CREATE RULE — define a new rewrite rule
CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] RULEname
AS ONevent
TOtable_name
[ WHEREcondition
] DO [ ALSO | INSTEAD ] { NOTHING |command
| (command
;command
... ) } whereevent
can be one of: SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE
CREATE RULE
defines a new rule applying to a specified table or view.
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE
will either create a new rule, or replace an existing rule of the same name for the same table.
The
PostgreSQL
rule system allows one to define an alternative action to be performed on insertions, updates, or deletions in database tables. Roughly speaking, a rule causes additional commands to be executed when a given command on a given table is executed. Alternatively, an
INSTEAD
rule can replace a given command by another, or cause a command not to be executed at all. Rules are used to implement SQL views as well. It is important to realize that a rule is really a command transformation mechanism, or command macro. The transformation happens before the execution of the command starts. If you actually want an operation that fires independently for each physical row, you probably want to use a trigger, not a rule. More information about the rules system is in Chapter 41.
Presently,
ON SELECT
rules must be unconditional
INSTEAD
rules and must have actions that consist of a single
SELECT
command. Thus, an
ON SELECT
rule effectively turns the table into a view, whose visible contents are the rows returned by the rule's
SELECT
command rather than whatever had been stored in the table (if anything). It is considered better style to write a
CREATE VIEW
command than to create a real table and define an
ON SELECT
rule for it.
You can create the illusion of an updatable view by defining
ON INSERT
,
ON UPDATE
, and
ON DELETE
rules (or any subset of those that's sufficient for your purposes) to replace update actions on the view with appropriate updates on other tables. If you want to support
INSERT RETURNING
and so on, then be sure to put a suitable
RETURNING
clause into each of these rules.
There is a catch if you try to use conditional rules for complex view updates: there
must
be an unconditional
INSTEAD
rule for each action you wish to allow on the view. If the rule is conditional, or is not
INSTEAD
, then the system will still reject attempts to perform the update action, because it thinks it might end up trying to perform the action on the dummy table of the view in some cases. If you want to handle all the useful cases in conditional rules, add an unconditional
DO INSTEAD NOTHING
rule to ensure that the system understands it will never be called on to update the dummy table. Then make the conditional rules non-
INSTEAD
; in the cases where they are applied, they add to the default
INSTEAD NOTHING
action. (This method does not currently work to support
RETURNING
queries, however.)
A view that is simple enough to be automatically updatable (see CREATE VIEW ) does not require a user-created rule in order to be updatable. While you can create an explicit rule anyway, the automatic update transformation will generally outperform an explicit rule.
Another alternative worth considering is to use
INSTEAD OF
triggers (see
CREATE TRIGGER
) in place of rules.
name
The name of a rule to create. This must be distinct from the name of any other rule for the same table. Multiple rules on the same table and same event type are applied in alphabetical name order.
event
The event is one of
SELECT
,
INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or
DELETE
. Note that an
INSERT
containing an
ON CONFLICT
clause cannot be used on tables that have either
INSERT
or
UPDATE
rules. Consider using an updatable view instead.
table_name
The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the table or view the rule applies to.
condition
Any
SQL
conditional expression (returning
boolean
). The condition expression cannot refer to any tables except
NEW
and
OLD
, and cannot contain aggregate functions.
INSTEAD
INSTEAD
indicates that the commands should be executed
instead of
the original command.
ALSO
ALSO
indicates that the commands should be executed
in addition to
the original command.
If neither
ALSO
nor
INSTEAD
is specified,
ALSO
is the default.
command
The command or commands that make up the rule action. Valid commands are
SELECT
,
INSERT
,
UPDATE
,
DELETE
, or
NOTIFY
.
Within
condition
and
command
, the special table names
NEW
and
OLD
can be used to refer to values in the referenced table.
NEW
is valid in
ON INSERT
and
ON UPDATE
rules to refer to the new row being inserted or updated.
OLD
is valid in
ON UPDATE
and
ON DELETE
rules to refer to the existing row being updated or deleted.
You must be the owner of a table to create or change rules for it.
In a rule for
INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or
DELETE
on a view, you can add a
RETURNING
clause that emits the view's columns. This clause will be used to compute the outputs if the rule is triggered by an
INSERT RETURNING
,
UPDATE RETURNING
, or
DELETE RETURNING
command respectively. When the rule is triggered by a command without
RETURNING
, the rule's
RETURNING
clause will be ignored. The current implementation allows only unconditional
INSTEAD
rules to contain
RETURNING
; furthermore there can be at most one
RETURNING
clause among all the rules for the same event. (This ensures that there is only one candidate
RETURNING
clause to be used to compute the results.)
RETURNING
queries on the view will be rejected if there is no
RETURNING
clause in any available rule.
It is very important to take care to avoid circular rules. For example, though each of the following two rule definitions are accepted by
PostgreSQL
, the
SELECT
command would cause
PostgreSQL
to report an error because of recursive expansion of a rule:
CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS ON SELECT TO t1 DO INSTEAD SELECT * FROM t2; CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS ON SELECT TO t2 DO INSTEAD SELECT * FROM t1; SELECT * FROM t1;
Presently, if a rule action contains a
NOTIFY
command, the
NOTIFY
command will be executed unconditionally, that is, the
NOTIFY
will be issued even if there are not any rows that the rule should apply to. For example, in:
CREATE RULE notify_me AS ON UPDATE TO mytable DO ALSO NOTIFY mytable; UPDATE mytable SET name = 'foo' WHERE id = 42;
one
NOTIFY
event will be sent during the
UPDATE
, whether or not there are any rows that match the condition
id = 42
. This is an implementation restriction that might be fixed in future releases.
CREATE RULE
is a
PostgreSQL
language extension, as is the entire query rewrite system.
CREATE RULE — define a new rewrite rule
CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] RULEname
AS ONevent
TOtable_name
[ WHEREcondition
] DO [ ALSO | INSTEAD ] { NOTHING |command
| (command
;command
... ) } whereevent
can be one of: SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE
CREATE RULE
defines a new rule applying to a specified table or view.
CREATE OR REPLACE RULE
will either create a new rule, or replace an existing rule of the same name for the same table.
The
PostgreSQL
rule system allows one to define an alternative action to be performed on insertions, updates, or deletions in database tables. Roughly speaking, a rule causes additional commands to be executed when a given command on a given table is executed. Alternatively, an
INSTEAD
rule can replace a given command by another, or cause a command not to be executed at all. Rules are used to implement SQL views as well. It is important to realize that a rule is really a command transformation mechanism, or command macro. The transformation happens before the execution of the command starts. If you actually want an operation that fires independently for each physical row, you probably want to use a trigger, not a rule. More information about the rules system is in Chapter 41.
Presently,
ON SELECT
rules must be unconditional
INSTEAD
rules and must have actions that consist of a single
SELECT
command. Thus, an
ON SELECT
rule effectively turns the table into a view, whose visible contents are the rows returned by the rule's
SELECT
command rather than whatever had been stored in the table (if anything). It is considered better style to write a
CREATE VIEW
command than to create a real table and define an
ON SELECT
rule for it.
You can create the illusion of an updatable view by defining
ON INSERT
,
ON UPDATE
, and
ON DELETE
rules (or any subset of those that's sufficient for your purposes) to replace update actions on the view with appropriate updates on other tables. If you want to support
INSERT RETURNING
and so on, then be sure to put a suitable
RETURNING
clause into each of these rules.
There is a catch if you try to use conditional rules for complex view updates: there
must
be an unconditional
INSTEAD
rule for each action you wish to allow on the view. If the rule is conditional, or is not
INSTEAD
, then the system will still reject attempts to perform the update action, because it thinks it might end up trying to perform the action on the dummy table of the view in some cases. If you want to handle all the useful cases in conditional rules, add an unconditional
DO INSTEAD NOTHING
rule to ensure that the system understands it will never be called on to update the dummy table. Then make the conditional rules non-
INSTEAD
; in the cases where they are applied, they add to the default
INSTEAD NOTHING
action. (This method does not currently work to support
RETURNING
queries, however.)
A view that is simple enough to be automatically updatable (see CREATE VIEW ) does not require a user-created rule in order to be updatable. While you can create an explicit rule anyway, the automatic update transformation will generally outperform an explicit rule.
Another alternative worth considering is to use
INSTEAD OF
triggers (see
CREATE TRIGGER
) in place of rules.
name
The name of a rule to create. This must be distinct from the name of any other rule for the same table. Multiple rules on the same table and same event type are applied in alphabetical name order.
event
The event is one of
SELECT
,
INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or
DELETE
. Note that an
INSERT
containing an
ON CONFLICT
clause cannot be used on tables that have either
INSERT
or
UPDATE
rules. Consider using an updatable view instead.
table_name
The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the table or view the rule applies to.
condition
Any
SQL
conditional expression (returning
boolean
). The condition expression cannot refer to any tables except
NEW
and
OLD
, and cannot contain aggregate functions.
INSTEAD
INSTEAD
indicates that the commands should be executed
instead of
the original command.
ALSO
ALSO
indicates that the commands should be executed
in addition to
the original command.
If neither
ALSO
nor
INSTEAD
is specified,
ALSO
is the default.
command
The command or commands that make up the rule action. Valid commands are
SELECT
,
INSERT
,
UPDATE
,
DELETE
, or
NOTIFY
.
Within
condition
and
command
, the special table names
NEW
and
OLD
can be used to refer to values in the referenced table.
NEW
is valid in
ON INSERT
and
ON UPDATE
rules to refer to the new row being inserted or updated.
OLD
is valid in
ON UPDATE
and
ON DELETE
rules to refer to the existing row being updated or deleted.
You must be the owner of a table to create or change rules for it.
In a rule for
INSERT
,
UPDATE
, or
DELETE
on a view, you can add a
RETURNING
clause that emits the view's columns. This clause will be used to compute the outputs if the rule is triggered by an
INSERT RETURNING
,
UPDATE RETURNING
, or
DELETE RETURNING
command respectively. When the rule is triggered by a command without
RETURNING
, the rule's
RETURNING
clause will be ignored. The current implementation allows only unconditional
INSTEAD
rules to contain
RETURNING
; furthermore there can be at most one
RETURNING
clause among all the rules for the same event. (This ensures that there is only one candidate
RETURNING
clause to be used to compute the results.)
RETURNING
queries on the view will be rejected if there is no
RETURNING
clause in any available rule.
It is very important to take care to avoid circular rules. For example, though each of the following two rule definitions are accepted by
PostgreSQL
, the
SELECT
command would cause
PostgreSQL
to report an error because of recursive expansion of a rule:
CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS ON SELECT TO t1 DO INSTEAD SELECT * FROM t2; CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS ON SELECT TO t2 DO INSTEAD SELECT * FROM t1; SELECT * FROM t1;
Presently, if a rule action contains a
NOTIFY
command, the
NOTIFY
command will be executed unconditionally, that is, the
NOTIFY
will be issued even if there are not any rows that the rule should apply to. For example, in:
CREATE RULE notify_me AS ON UPDATE TO mytable DO ALSO NOTIFY mytable; UPDATE mytable SET name = 'foo' WHERE id = 42;
one
NOTIFY
event will be sent during the
UPDATE
, whether or not there are any rows that match the condition
id = 42
. This is an implementation restriction that might be fixed in future releases.
CREATE RULE
is a
PostgreSQL
language extension, as is the entire query rewrite system.
GIN stands for Generalized Inverted Index. GIN is designed for handling cases where the items to be indexed are composite values, and the queries to be handled by the index need to search for element values that appear within the composite items. For example, the items could be documents, and the queries could be searches for documents containing specific words.
We use the word item to refer to a composite value that is to be indexed, and the word key to refer to an element value. GIN always stores and searches for keys, not item values per se.
A GIN index stores a set of (key, posting list) pairs, where a posting list is a set of row IDs in which the key occurs. The same row ID can appear in multiple posting lists, since an item can contain more than one key. Each key value is stored only once, so a GIN index is very compact for cases where the same key appears many times.
GIN is generalized in the sense that the GIN access method code does not need to know the specific operations that it accelerates. Instead, it uses custom strategies defined for particular data types. The strategy defines how keys are extracted from indexed items and query conditions, and how to determine whether a row that contains some of the key values in a query actually satisfies the query.
One advantage of GIN is that it allows the development of custom data types with the appropriate access methods, by an expert in the domain of the data type, rather than a database expert. This is much the same advantage as using GiST .
The GIN implementation in PostgreSQL is primarily maintained by Teodor Sigaev and Oleg Bartunov. There is more information about GIN on their website.
GIN stands for Generalized Inverted Index. GIN is designed for handling cases where the items to be indexed are composite values, and the queries to be handled by the index need to search for element values that appear within the composite items. For example, the items could be documents, and the queries could be searches for documents containing specific words.
We use the word item to refer to a composite value that is to be indexed, and the word key to refer to an element value. GIN always stores and searches for keys, not item values per se.
A GIN index stores a set of (key, posting list) pairs, where a posting list is a set of row IDs in which the key occurs. The same row ID can appear in multiple posting lists, since an item can contain more than one key. Each key value is stored only once, so a GIN index is very compact for cases where the same key appears many times.
GIN is generalized in the sense that the GIN access method code does not need to know the specific operations that it accelerates. Instead, it uses custom strategies defined for particular data types. The strategy defines how keys are extracted from indexed items and query conditions, and how to determine whether a row that contains some of the key values in a query actually satisfies the query.
One advantage of GIN is that it allows the development of custom data types with the appropriate access methods, by an expert in the domain of the data type, rather than a database expert. This is much the same advantage as using GiST .
The GIN implementation in PostgreSQL is primarily maintained by Teodor Sigaev and Oleg Bartunov. There is more information about GIN on their website.
Table of Contents
PostgreSQL can devise query plans that can leverage multiple CPUs in order to answer queries faster. This feature is known as parallel query. Many queries cannot benefit from parallel query, either due to limitations of the current implementation or because there is no imaginable query plan that is any faster than the serial query plan. However, for queries that can benefit, the speedup from parallel query is often very significant. Many queries can run more than twice as fast when using parallel query, and some queries can run four times faster or even more. Queries that touch a large amount of data but return only a few rows to the user will typically benefit most. This chapter explains some details of how parallel query works and in which situations it can be used so that users who wish to make use of it can understand what to expect.