Components let you split the UI into independent, reusable pieces, and think about each piece in isolation. This page provides an introduction to the idea of components. You can find a
detailed component API reference here.
Conceptually, components are like JavaScript functions. They accept arbitrary inputs (called “props”) and return React elements describing what should appear on the screen.
Function and Class Components
The simplest way to define a component is to write a JavaScript function:
This function is a valid React component because it accepts a single “props” (which stands for properties) object argument with data and returns a React element. We call such components “function components” because they are literally JavaScript functions.
You can also use an ES6 class to define a component:
The above two components are equivalent from React’s point of view.
Function and Class components both have some additional features that we will discuss in the next sections.
Rendering a Component
Previously, we only encountered React elements that represent DOM tags:
const element =<div/>;
However, elements can also represent user-defined components:
const element =<Welcomename="Sara"/>;
When React sees an element representing a user-defined component, it passes JSX attributes and children to this component as a single object. We call this object “props”.
For example, this code renders “Hello, Sara” on the page:
const root = ReactDOM.createRoot(document.getElementById('root')); const element =<Welcomename="Sara"/>;root.render(element);
Try it on CodePen
Let’s recap what happens in this example:
We call
root.render()
with the
<Welcome name="Sara" />
element.
React calls the
Welcome
component with
{name: 'Sara'}
as the props.
Our
Welcome
component returns a
<h1>Hello, Sara</h1>
element as the result.
React DOM efficiently updates the DOM to match
<h1>Hello, Sara</h1>
.
Note:
Always start component names with a capital letter.
React treats components starting with lowercase letters as DOM tags. For example,
<div />
represents an HTML div tag, but
<Welcome />
represents a component and requires
Welcome
to be in scope.
To learn more about the reasoning behind this convention, please read JSX In Depth.
Composing Components
Components can refer to other components in their output. This lets us use the same component abstraction for any level of detail. A button, a form, a dialog, a screen: in React apps, all those are commonly expressed as components.
For example, we can create an
App
component that renders
Welcome
many times:
Typically, new React apps have a single
App
component at the very top. However, if you integrate React into an existing app, you might start bottom-up with a small component like
Button
and gradually work your way to the top of the view hierarchy.
Extracting Components
Don’t be afraid to split components into smaller components.
It accepts
author
(an object),
text
(a string), and
date
(a date) as props, and describes a comment on a social media website.
This component can be tricky to change because of all the nesting, and it is also hard to reuse individual parts of it. Let’s extract a few components from it.
The
Avatar
doesn’t need to know that it is being rendered inside a
Comment
. This is why we have given its prop a more generic name:
user
rather than
author
.
We recommend naming props from the component’s own point of view rather than the context in which it is being used.
Extracting components might seem like grunt work at first, but having a palette of reusable components pays off in larger apps. A good rule of thumb is that if a part of your UI is used several times (
Button
,
Panel
,
Avatar
), or is complex enough on its own (
App
,
FeedStory
,
Comment
), it is a good candidate to be extracted to a separate component.
Props are Read-Only
Whether you declare a component as a function or a class, it must never modify its own props. Consider this
sum
function:
functionsum(a, b){ return a + b; }
Such functions are called “pure” because they do not attempt to change their inputs, and always return the same result for the same inputs.
In contrast, this function is impure because it changes its own input:
React is pretty flexible but it has a single strict rule:
All React components must act like pure functions with respect to their props.
Of course, application UIs are dynamic and change over time. In the next section, we will introduce a new concept of “state”. State allows React components to change their output over time in response to user actions, network responses, and anything else, without violating this rule.
Consider the ticking clock example from one of the previous sections. In Rendering Elements, we have only learned one way to update the UI. We call
root.render()
to change the rendered output:
functiontick(){ const element =( <div> <h1>Hello, world!</h1> <h2>It is {newDate().toLocaleTimeString()}.</h2> </div> ); root.render(element);}
setInterval(tick,1000);
Try it on CodePen
In this section, we will learn how to make the
Clock
component truly reusable and encapsulated. It will set up its own timer and update itself every second.
We can start by encapsulating how the clock looks:
However, it misses a crucial requirement: the fact that the
Clock
sets up a timer and updates the UI every second should be an implementation detail of the
Clock
.
Ideally we want to write this once and have the
Clock
update itself:
root.render(<Clock/>);
To implement this, we need to add “state” to the
Clock
component.
State is similar to props, but it is private and fully controlled by the component.
Converting a Function to a Class
You can convert a function component like
Clock
to a class in five steps:
Create an ES6 class, with the same name, that extends
React.Component
.
Add a single empty method to it called
render()
.
Move the body of the function into the
render()
method.
Replace
props
with
this.props
in the
render()
body.
Clock
is now defined as a class rather than a function.
The
render
method will be called each time an update happens, but as long as we render
<Clock />
into the same DOM node, only a single instance of the
Clock
class will be used. This lets us use additional features such as local state and lifecycle methods.
Adding Local State to a Class
We will move the
date
from props to state in three steps:
Replace
this.props.date
with
this.state.date
in the
render()
method:
Note how we save the timer ID right on
this
(
this.timerID
).
While
this.props
is set up by React itself and
this.state
has a special meaning, you are free to add additional fields to the class manually if you need to store something that doesn’t participate in the data flow (like a timer ID).
We will tear down the timer in the
componentWillUnmount()
lifecycle method:
Let’s quickly recap what’s going on and the order in which the methods are called:
When
<Clock />
is passed to
root.render()
, React calls the constructor of the
Clock
component. Since
Clock
needs to display the current time, it initializes
this.state
with an object including the current time. We will later update this state.
React then calls the
Clock
component’s
render()
method. This is how React learns what should be displayed on the screen. React then updates the DOM to match the
Clock
’s render output.
When the
Clock
output is inserted in the DOM, React calls the
componentDidMount()
lifecycle method. Inside it, the
Clock
component asks the browser to set up a timer to call the component’s
tick()
method once a second.
Every second the browser calls the
tick()
method. Inside it, the
Clock
component schedules a UI update by calling
setState()
with an object containing the current time. Thanks to the
setState()
call, React knows the state has changed, and calls the
render()
method again to learn what should be on the screen. This time,
this.state.date
in the
render()
method will be different, and so the render output will include the updated time. React updates the DOM accordingly.
If the
Clock
component is ever removed from the DOM, React calls the
componentWillUnmount()
lifecycle method so the timer is stopped.
Using State Correctly
There are three things you should know about
setState()
.
Do Not Modify State Directly
For example, this will not re-render a component:
// Wrong this.state.comment ='Hello';
Instead, use
setState()
:
// Correct this.setState({comment:'Hello'});
The only place where you can assign
this.state
is the constructor.
State Updates May Be Asynchronous
React may batch multiple
setState()
calls into a single update for performance.
Because
this.props
and
this.state
may be updated asynchronously, you should not rely on their values for calculating the next state.
For example, this code may fail to update the counter:
To fix it, use a second form of
setState()
that accepts a function rather than an object. That function will receive the previous state as the first argument, and the props at the time the update is applied as the second argument:
The merging is shallow, so
this.setState({comments})
leaves
this.state.posts
intact, but completely replaces
this.state.comments
.
The Data Flows Down
Neither parent nor child components can know if a certain component is stateful or stateless, and they shouldn’t care whether it is defined as a function or a class.
This is why state is often called local or encapsulated. It is not accessible to any component other than the one that owns and sets it.
A component may choose to pass its state down as props to its child components:
<FormattedDatedate={this.state.date}/>
The
FormattedDate
component would receive the
date
in its props and wouldn’t know whether it came from the
Clock
’s state, from the
Clock
’s props, or was typed by hand:
functionFormattedDate(props){ return<h2>It is {props.date.toLocaleTimeString()}.</h2>; }
Try it on CodePen
This is commonly called a “top-down” or “unidirectional” data flow. Any state is always owned by some specific component, and any data or UI derived from that state can only affect components “below” them in the tree.
If you imagine a component tree as a waterfall of props, each component’s state is like an additional water source that joins it at an arbitrary point but also flows down.
To show that all components are truly isolated, we can create an
App
component that renders three
<Clock>
s:
Each
Clock
sets up its own timer and updates independently.
In React apps, whether a component is stateful or stateless is considered an implementation detail of the component that may change over time. You can use stateless components inside stateful components, and vice versa.
Another difference is that you cannot return
false
to prevent default behavior in React. You must call
preventDefault
explicitly. For example, with plain HTML, to prevent the default form behavior of submitting, you can write:
When using React, you generally don’t need to call
addEventListener
to add listeners to a DOM element after it is created. Instead, just provide a listener when the element is initially rendered.
When you define a component using an ES6 class, a common pattern is for an event handler to be a method on the class. For example, this
Toggle
component renders a button that lets the user toggle between “ON” and “OFF” states:
You have to be careful about the meaning of
this
in JSX callbacks. In JavaScript, class methods are not bound by default. If you forget to bind
this.handleClick
and pass it to
onClick
,
this
will be
undefined
when the function is actually called.
This is not React-specific behavior; it is a part of how functions work in JavaScript. Generally, if you refer to a method without
()
after it, such as
onClick={this.handleClick}
, you should bind that method.
If calling
bind
annoys you, there are two ways you can get around this. You can use public class fields syntax to correctly bind callbacks:
classLoggingButtonextendsReact.Component{ // This syntax ensures `this` is bound within handleClick.handleClick=()=>{ console.log('this is:',this);};render(){ return( <buttononClick={this.handleClick}> Click me </button> ); } }
This syntax is enabled by default in Create React App.
If you aren’t using class fields syntax, you can use an arrow function in the callback:
render(){ // This syntax ensures `this` is bound within handleClickreturn(<buttononClick={()=>this.handleClick()}> Click me </button> ); } }
The problem with this syntax is that a different callback is created each time the
LoggingButton
renders. In most cases, this is fine. However, if this callback is passed as a prop to lower components, those components might do an extra re-rendering. We generally recommend binding in the constructor or using the class fields syntax, to avoid this sort of performance problem.
Passing Arguments to Event Handlers
Inside a loop, it is common to want to pass an extra parameter to an event handler. For example, if
id
is the row ID, either of the following would work:
The above two lines are equivalent, and use arrow functions and
Function.prototype.bind
respectively.
In both cases, the
e
argument representing the React event will be passed as a second argument after the ID. With an arrow function, we have to pass it explicitly, but with
bind
any further arguments are automatically forwarded.
In React, you can create distinct components that encapsulate behavior you need. Then, you can render only some of them, depending on the state of your application.
In the example below, we will create a stateful component called
LoginControl
.
It will render either
<LoginButton />
or
<LogoutButton />
depending on its current state. It will also render a
<Greeting />
from the previous example:
While declaring a variable and using an
if
statement is a fine way to conditionally render a component, sometimes you might want to use a shorter syntax. There are a few ways to inline conditions in JSX, explained below.
Inline If with Logical && Operator
You may embed expressions in JSX by wrapping them in curly braces. This includes the JavaScript logical
&&
operator. It can be handy for conditionally including an element:
functionMailbox(props){ const unreadMessages = props.unreadMessages; return( <div> <h1>Hello!</h1> {unreadMessages.length >0&&<h2> You have {unreadMessages.length} unread messages.</h2>}</div> ); }
It works because in JavaScript,
true && expression
always evaluates to
expression
, and
false && expression
always evaluates to
false
.
Therefore, if the condition is
true
, the element right after
&&
will appear in the output. If it is
false
, React will ignore and skip it.
Note that returning a falsy expression will still cause the element after
&&
to be skipped but will return the falsy expression. In the example below,
<div>0</div>
will be returned by the render method.
Just like in JavaScript, it is up to you to choose an appropriate style based on what you and your team consider more readable. Also remember that whenever conditions become too complex, it might be a good time to extract a component.
Preventing Component from Rendering
In rare cases you might want a component to hide itself even though it was rendered by another component. To do this return
null
instead of its render output.
In the example below, the
<WarningBanner />
is rendered depending on the value of the prop called
warn
. If the value of the prop is
false
, then the component does not render:
Returning
null
from a component’s
render
method does not affect the firing of the component’s lifecycle methods. For instance
componentDidUpdate
will still be called.
const numbers =[1,2,3,4,5]; const doubled = numbers.map((number)=> number *2);console.log(doubled);
This code logs
[2, 4, 6, 8, 10]
to the console.
In React, transforming arrays into lists of elements is nearly identical.
Rendering Multiple Components
You can build collections of elements and include them in JSX using curly braces
{}
.
Below, we loop through the
numbers
array using the JavaScript
map()
function. We return a
<li>
element for each item. Finally, we assign the resulting array of elements to
listItems
:
When you run this code, you’ll be given a warning that a key should be provided for list items. A “key” is a special string attribute you need to include when creating lists of elements. We’ll discuss why it’s important in the next section.
Let’s assign a
key
to our list items inside
numbers.map()
and fix the missing key issue.
Keys help React identify which items have changed, are added, or are removed. Keys should be given to the elements inside the array to give the elements a stable identity:
The best way to pick a key is to use a string that uniquely identifies a list item among its siblings. Most often you would use IDs from your data as keys:
When you don’t have stable IDs for rendered items, you may use the item index as a key as a last resort:
const todoItems = todos.map((todo, index)=> // Only do this if items have no stable IDs<likey={index}>{todo.text} </li> );
We don’t recommend using indexes for keys if the order of items may change. This can negatively impact performance and may cause issues with component state. Check out Robin Pokorny’s article for an in-depth explanation on the negative impacts of using an index as a key. If you choose not to assign an explicit key to list items then React will default to using indexes as keys.
Here is an in-depth explanation about why keys are necessary if you’re interested in learning more.
Extracting Components with Keys
Keys only make sense in the context of the surrounding array.
For example, if you extract a
ListItem
component, you should keep the key on the
<ListItem />
elements in the array rather than on the
<li>
element in the
ListItem
itself.
Example: Incorrect Key Usage
functionListItem(props){ const value = props.value; return( // Wrong! There is no need to specify the key here:<likey={value.toString()}>{value} </li> ); }
functionNumberList(props){ const numbers = props.numbers; const listItems = numbers.map((number)=> // Wrong! The key should have been specified here:<ListItemvalue={number}/>); return( <ul> {listItems} </ul> ); }
Example: Correct Key Usage
functionListItem(props){ // Correct! There is no need to specify the key here:return<li>{props.value}</li>;}
functionNumberList(props){ const numbers = props.numbers; const listItems = numbers.map((number)=> // Correct! Key should be specified inside the array.<ListItemkey={number.toString()}value={number}/>); return( <ul> {listItems} </ul> ); }
Try it on CodePen
A good rule of thumb is that elements inside the
map()
call need keys.
Keys Must Only Be Unique Among Siblings
Keys used within arrays should be unique among their siblings. However, they don’t need to be globally unique. We can use the same keys when we produce two different arrays:
const posts =[ {id:1,title:'Hello World',content:'Welcome to learning React!'}, {id:2,title:'Installation',content:'You can install React from npm.'} ];
Keys serve as a hint to React but they don’t get passed to your components. If you need the same value in your component, pass it explicitly as a prop with a different name:
Sometimes this results in clearer code, but this style can also be abused. Like in JavaScript, it is up to you to decide whether it is worth extracting a variable for readability. Keep in mind that if the
map()
body is too nested, it might be a good time to extract a component.
HTML form elements work a bit differently from other DOM elements in React, because form elements naturally keep some internal state. For example, this form in plain HTML accepts a single name:
This form has the default HTML form behavior of browsing to a new page when the user submits the form. If you want this behavior in React, it just works. But in most cases, it’s convenient to have a JavaScript function that handles the submission of the form and has access to the data that the user entered into the form. The standard way to achieve this is with a technique called “controlled components”.
In HTML, form elements such as
<input>
,
<textarea>
, and
<select>
typically maintain their own state and update it based on user input. In React, mutable state is typically kept in the state property of components, and only updated with
setState()
.
We can combine the two by making the React state be the “single source of truth”. Then the React component that renders a form also controls what happens in that form on subsequent user input. An input form element whose value is controlled by React in this way is called a “controlled component”.
For example, if we want to make the previous example log the name when it is submitted, we can write the form as a controlled component:
handleChange(event){this.setState({value: event.target.value});} handleSubmit(event){ alert('A name was submitted: '+this.state.value); event.preventDefault(); }
Since the
value
attribute is set on our form element, the displayed value will always be
this.state.value
, making the React state the source of truth. Since
handleChange
runs on every keystroke to update the React state, the displayed value will update as the user types.
With a controlled component, the input’s value is always driven by the React state. While this means you have to type a bit more code, you can now pass the value to other UI elements too, or reset it from other event handlers.
The textarea Tag
In HTML, a
<textarea>
element defines its text by its children:
<textarea> Hello there, this is some text in a text area </textarea>
In React, a
<textarea>
uses a
value
attribute instead. This way, a form using a
<textarea>
can be written very similarly to a form that uses a single-line input:
classEssayFormextendsReact.Component{ constructor(props){ super(props); this.state ={value:'Please write an essay about your favorite DOM element.'}; this.handleChange =this.handleChange.bind(this); this.handleSubmit =this.handleSubmit.bind(this); }
handleChange(event){this.setState({value: event.target.value});} handleSubmit(event){ alert('An essay was submitted: '+this.state.value); event.preventDefault(); }
Note that the Coconut option is initially selected, because of the
selected
attribute. React, instead of using this
selected
attribute, uses a
value
attribute on the root
select
tag. This is more convenient in a controlled component because you only need to update it in one place. For example:
Overall, this makes it so that
<input type="text">
,
<textarea>
, and
<select>
all work very similarly - they all accept a
value
attribute that you can use to implement a controlled component.
Note
You can pass an array into the
value
attribute, allowing you to select multiple options in a
select
tag:
<selectmultiple={true}value={['B','C']}>
The file input Tag
In HTML, an
<input type="file">
lets the user choose one or more files from their device storage to be uploaded to a server or manipulated by JavaScript via the File API.
<inputtype="file"/>
Because its value is read-only, it is an
uncontrolled
component in React. It is discussed together with other uncontrolled components later in the documentation.
Handling Multiple Inputs
When you need to handle multiple controlled
input
elements, you can add a
name
attribute to each element and let the handler function choose what to do based on the value of
event.target.name
.
render(){ return( <form> <label> Is going: <input name="isGoing"type="checkbox" checked={this.state.isGoing} onChange={this.handleInputChange}/> </label> <br/> <label> Number of guests: <input name="numberOfGuests"type="number" value={this.state.numberOfGuests} onChange={this.handleInputChange}/> </label> </form> ); } }
Try it on CodePen
Note how we used the ES6 computed property name syntax to update the state key corresponding to the given input name:
this.setState({ [name]: value});
It is equivalent to this ES5 code:
var partialState ={}; partialState[name]= value;this.setState(partialState);
Also, since
setState()
automatically merges a partial state into the current state, we only needed to call it with the changed parts.
Controlled Input Null Value
Specifying the
value
prop on a controlled component prevents the user from changing the input unless you desire so. If you’ve specified a
value
but the input is still editable, you may have accidentally set
value
to
undefined
or
null
.
The following code demonstrates this. (The input is locked at first but becomes editable after a short delay.)
It can sometimes be tedious to use controlled components, because you need to write an event handler for every way your data can change and pipe all of the input state through a React component. This can become particularly annoying when you are converting a preexisting codebase to React, or integrating a React application with a non-React library. In these situations, you might want to check out uncontrolled components, an alternative technique for implementing input forms.
Fully-Fledged Solutions
If you’re looking for a complete solution including validation, keeping track of the visited fields, and handling form submission, Formik is one of the popular choices. However, it is built on the same principles of controlled components and managing state — so don’t neglect to learn them.